-------------------------------------------------------------------
APNIC Document identity
Title: Policies for IPv4 address space management in the Asia
Pacific region
Short title: add-manage-policy
Document ref: APNIC-086
Version: 004
Date of original publication: 21 December 2001
Date of this version: 19 March 2004
Review scheduled: n/a
Obsoletes: Previous versions
Status: Obsolete
Comments: n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Policies for IPv4 address space management in the Asia Pacific region
About this document
-------------------
This document represents current APNIC practices and policies for IPv4
address space.
This document should be read in conjunction with other APNIC documents,
including those dealing with membership and fees.
Table of contents
-----------------
Part 1: Background, definitions, goals, and environment
1 Introduction
2 Scope
3 Hierarchy of IPv4 address space distribution
4 Definitions
4.1 Internet Registry (IR)
4.1.1 Regional Internet Registry (RIR)
4.1.2 National Internet Registry (NIR)
4.1.3 Local Internet Registry (LIR)
4.2 Internet Exchange Point
4.3 Address space
4.4 Allocated and Assigned address space
4.4.1 Allocated
4.4.2 Assigned
5 Goals of address space management
5.1 Goals
5.1.1 Uniqueness
5.1.2 Registration
5.1.3 Aggregation
5.1.4 Conservation
5.1.5 Fairness
5.2 Conflict of goals
6 Policy environment
6.1 Routability
6.2 Internet growth rates
6.3 Collective responsibility
6.4 Impartiality
6.5 Varying levels of expertise
6.6 Address ownership
6.7 Address stockpiling
6.8 Evaluations to be based on best practice
6.9 Private address space
6.10 Minimum practical allocations
6.11 Documentation
6.12 Confidentiality
Part 2: Policies for address space management
7 General policy framework
7.1 IRs to adopt consistent address space management
policies
8 Address requests
8.1 Processing of requests dependent on correct
documentation
8.2 Security and confidentiality
8.3 Equitable processing of requests
8.4 General requirements for allocation requests
8.5 Organisations seeking address space from multiple IRs
9 Address allocation
9.1 Address space license
9.2 Slow start mechanism
9.2.1 Exceptions to slow start
9.3 Criteria for initial allocation
9.4 Criteria for subsequent allocations
9.4.1 No guarantee of contiguous allocations
9.5 Prior allocations to be used first
9.5.1 Special circumstances - large assignments
9.6 Reservations not supported
9.7 Non-portable address assignments
9.8 Validity of allocations and assignments
9.9 Transfer of address space
10 LIR address space management
10.1 Assignment window for LIRs
10.2 Assignment usage estimates
10.3 Sub-allocations by LIRs
10.3.1 Effect of sub-allocations on LIR's usage rate
10.4 Registration requirements
10.4.1 Updating registration details
10.4.2 Registering contact persons
10.5 Responsibility to maintain in-addr.arpa records
11 Assignments and exchanges
11.1 Small multihoming assignments
11.2 Internet Exchange Points
11.3 Critical infrastructure
11.4 Renumbering to promote aggregation
12 Mergers, acquisitions, and takeovers of LIRs
12.1 Updating registration details
12.2 Effect on membership agreement
12.3 Consequences for allocations
12.4 Closure of LIRs
13 Request evaluation guidelines
Part 1: Background, definitions, goals, and environment
_____________________________________________________________________
1 Introduction
--------------------
APNIC (the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre) is the Regional
Internet Registry for the Asia Pacific region, responsible
for distributing public Internet address space and related resources
in the region and for coordinating the development and implementation
of policies to manage those resources.
The policies described in this document have been developed by the
Internet community of the Asia Pacific region through a consensus
process facilitated by APNIC. They are to be implemented by APNIC and
by the National Internet Registries and the Local Internet Registries
throughout the region.
2 Scope
-------------
This document describes policies for the responsible management of
global IPv4 public address space in the Asia Pacific region.
Specifically, this document focuses on the goals, assumptions, and
policies relating to the allocation and assignment of IPv4 address
space.
This document does not describe specific addressing policies related to
IPv6, Multicast, Private Address Space, or Autonomous System numbers.
It should be read in conjunction with other APNIC documents, including
those dealing with membership and fees.
3 Hierarchy of IPv4 address space distribution
----------------------------------------------------
IPv4 addresses are distributed in accordance with the hierarchical
structure described in RFC2050, represented simply in fig.1.
[Figure 1: Diagram of distribution hierarchy]
fig.1 +--------+
| IANA |
+--------+
|
+-----------+-----------+...........+.............+
| | | : :
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +...........+
| ARIN | |RIPE NCC| | APNIC | | LACNIC | : Potential :
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+ :future RIRs:
| +...........+
+--------------+-------------+
| |
+------+ |
| NIR | | National Internet
+------+ | Registries
| |
+------+--+------+ |
| | | | Local Internet
+------+ | | +------+ Registries
| LIR | | | | LIR |
+------+ | | +------+
| | | |
+-----+ | | +-----+-----+
| | | | | |
+------+ | +------+ | +------+ | Internet Service
| ISP | | | ISP | | | ISP | | Providers
+------+ | +------+ | +------+ |
| | | | | |
+----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ End-users
| EU | | EU | | EU | | EU | | EU | | EU |
+----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ +----+
In this hierarchy, IANA allocates address space to APNIC, to be
redistributed throughout the Asia Pacific region. APNIC allocates
address space to Internet Registries (IRs) and also delegates to them
the authority to make assignments and allocations. In some cases APNIC
assigns address space to end users. National and Local IRs allocate
and assign address space to their members and customers under the
guidance of APNIC and in accordance with the policies and procedures
described in this document.
4 Definitions
-------------------
The following terms and definitions are used in this document.
4.1 Internet Registry (IR)
An Internet Registry (IR) is an organisation that is
responsible for distributing IP address space to its members
or customers and for registering those distributions. IRs are
classified according to their primary function and territorial
scope within the hierarchical structure depicted in fig.1
above.
IRs include:
* APNIC and other Regional Internet Registries (RIRs);
* National Internet Registries (NIRs);
* Local Internet Registries (LIRs), unless the specific
context of the reference requires otherwise.
4.1.1 Regional Internet Registry (RIR)
Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) are established under the
authority of IANA to serve and represent large geographical
regions. Their primary role is to manage, distribute, and
register public Internet address space within their respective
regions. Currently, there are four RIRs: APNIC, RIPE NCC,
LACNIC and ARIN, although a small number of additional RIRs
may be established in the future.
4.1.2 National Internet Registry (NIR)
A National Internet Registry (NIR) primarily allocates address
space to its members or constituents, which are generally LIRs
organised at a national level. NIRs are expected to apply their
policies and procedures fairly and equitably to all members of
their constituency.
The policies in this document apply to NIRs; however, this
document does not describe the entire roles and
responsibilities of NIRs with respect to their formal
relationship with APNIC. Such roles and responsibilities may
be described in other documents and agreements, subject to
APNIC Document review procedures.
4.1.3 Local Internet Registry (LIR)
A Local Internet Registry (LIR) is generally an Internet
Service Provider (ISP), and may assign address space to its own
network infrastructure and to users of its network services.
LIR customers may be other "downstream" ISPs, which further
assign address space to their own customers.
4.2 Internet Exchange Point
An Internet Exchange Point (IX or IXP) is a layer 1 and layer
2 network structure that interconnects three or more
Autonomous Systems (AS) for the purpose of Internet traffic
interchange.
4.3 Address space
In this document, address space means public IPv4 address
ranges, excluding multicast addresses and private addresses
defined by RFC1918.
4.4 Allocated and Assigned address space
For the purposes of understanding APNIC address space policies,
it is important to make a clear distinction between the terms
"allocated" and "assigned".
4.4.1 Allocated
Allocated address space is address space that is distributed
to IRs or other organisations for the purpose of subsequent
distribution by them.
4.4.2 Assigned
Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to
an ISP or end-user, for specific use within the Internet
infrastructure they operate.
Assignments must only be made for specific, documented purposes
and may not be sub-assigned.
5 Goals of address space management
-----------------------------------------
5.1 Goals
The goals described here were formulated by the Internet
community and reflect the mutual interest of all members of
that community in ensuring that the Internet is able to
function and grow to the maximum extent possible.
It is APNIC's primary duty, as a custodian of a public
resource, to ensure that these goals are met within the Asia
Pacific region. APNIC does this by providing guidance and
leadership in developing and implementing responsible policies
and practices.
It is the responsibility of every NIR and LIR to also ensure
that these goals are met within their respective regions and
communities.
5.1.1 Uniqueness
Every assignment and allocation of address space must be
guaranteed as globally unique. This is an absolute
requirement for ensuring that every public host on the
Internet can be uniquely identified.
5.1.2 Registration
Assignments and allocations of address space must be
registered in a publicly accessible registry. This is
necessary to ensure uniqueness and to provide information for
Internet troubleshooting at all levels. It also reflects the
expectation of the Internet community that custodians of
these public resources should be identifiable.
5.1.3 Aggregation
Wherever possible, address space should be distributed in a
hierarchical manner, according to the topology of network
infrastructure. This is necessary to permit the aggregation
of routing information by ISPs, and to limit the expansion
of Internet routing tables.
5.1.4 Conservation
To maximize the lifetime of the available resource, address
space must be distributed according to actual need and for
immediate use. Stockpiling address space and maintaining
reservations are contrary to this goal.
Conservation also implies efficiency. Therefore, all users of
address space should adopt techniques such as Variable Length
Subnet Masking (VLSM) and appropriate technologies that
ensure the address space is not used wastefully.
5.1.5 Fairness
All policies and practices relating to the use of address
space should apply fairly and equitably to all existing and
potential members of the Internet community, regardless of
their location, nationality, size, or any other factor.
5.2 Conflict of goals
The goals of conservation and aggregation often conflict with
each other. Also, some or all of the goals may occasionally
conflict with the interests of individual IRs or end-users.
Therefore, IRs evaluating requests for address space must
carefully analyse all relevant considerations and try to
balance the needs of the requestor with the needs of the
Internet community as a whole.
This document is intended to help IRs perform their role in
consistent and equitable ways. IRs must maintain full
documentation of and transparency within the decision making
process.
6 Policy environment
--------------------------
Apart from the goals described in Section 5, other factors influence
the APNIC policy environment. These other factors include the
expectations of the Internet community, current administrative
structures, and technological constraints.
The policy environment may change quickly or in unpredictable ways,
so APNIC, on behalf of its members, must monitor any changes and
communicate any policy implications.
This Section describes the factors in the current operating
environment that have been most important in determining current
APNIC policies.
6.1 Routability
The routability of address space throughout the Internet can
never be guaranteed by any single organisation.To reduce the
number of globally advertised routes, ISPs may implement
route filtering policies based on prefix length. As a result,
small portable assignments are the most likely to suffer
routability problems. Therefore, APNIC policies encourage
those seeking address space to request from upstream
providers rather than from APNIC directly.
6.2 Internet growth rates
Early strategies for distributing address space did not
anticipate the rapid growth of the Internet and the scaling
problems that followed, affecting both the amount of address
space available and routing. Therefore, APNIC policies take
account of past experience and seek to manage address space
in a way that will maximise future scaling of the Internet.
6.3 Collective responsibility
APNIC shares with its members and their customers a
collective responsibility to ensure manageable and scalable
Internet growth and to make decisions consistent with the
goals described in Section 5. Therefore, APNIC policies and
procedures are developed by APNIC members and the broader
Internet community as a whole, in the common interest of
those communities.
In implementing policies, APNIC and its members rely on an
implicit trust that delegated responsibilities are carried out
in good faith. Specifically, APNIC must trust that the
information gathered from members during the request process
is genuine and accurate.
6.4 Impartiality
APNIC represents the interests of the Internet community in
general and the Internet community of the Asia Pacific region
in particular. Therefore, APNIC must apply its policies fairly
and equitably, without regard to an organisation's size,
geographic location, or any other factor.
6.5 Varying levels of expertise
Different IRs and end users have varying levels of experience
and expertise. APNIC policies allow for varying levels of
assistance and monitoring, appropriate to ensure a consistent
approach to address space management throughout the AP
Internet community.
6.6 Address ownership
The Internet community regards address space as a scarce,
public resource that should only be distributed according to
demonstrated need. ISPs and other organisations and
individuals that use address space are considered
"custodians" rather than "owners" of the resource. As address
space becomes more scarce, address space management policies
may be adjusted by the community.
6.7 Address stockpiling
Stockpiling addresses is harmful to the goals of conservation
and fairness. APNIC policies must prevent stockpiling and
ensure efficient deployment of address space on the basis of
immediate demonstrated need.
6.8 Evaluations to be based on best practice
APNIC should ensure that address space holders adopt current
best practice in management of the resources they use. If
appropriate technologies exist for improved management of
address space in particular situations, the community expects
that those technologies should be used.
APNIC consults with its members and the broader Internet
community to define and develop current best practice
recommendations relating to Internet addressing technologies
and techniques.
6.9 Private address space
The use of private address space may be appropriate for
addressing networks that are connected to the Internet via a
firewall, and where there are not technical requirements for
the use of public address space.
In general, private address space should be used for networks
not connected to the Internet.
6.10 Minimum practical allocations
Because the goals of aggregation and conservation conflict,
it is necessary to apply a minimum practical size for address
space allocations. This minimum allocation size may be
reviewed from time to time, as technologies and administrative
conditions evolve.
The current minimum practical allocation is a /20 (4,096
addresses).
6.11 Documentation
To properly evaluate requests, IRs must carefully examine all
relevant documentation relating to the networks in question.
This documentation may include:
* network engineering plans;
* subnetting plans;
* descriptions of network topology;
* descriptions of network routing plans;
* equipment invoices and purchase orders;
* other relevant documents.
All documentation should conform to a consistent standard and
any estimates and predictions that are documented must be
realistic and justifiable.
6.12 Confidentiality
The documentation which supports address space requests
involves information that may be highly confidential to the
organisations and individuals involved. Therefore, APNIC will
operate in ways that reflect the trust implicit in its
position by applying and enforcing procedures that protect the
confidential information of its members and their customers.
Part 2: Policies for address space management
_____________________________________________________________________
7 General policy framework
--------------------------------
7.1 IRs to adopt consistent address space management policies
All NIRs and LIRs that receive address space from APNIC
(either directly or indirectly) must adopt allocation and
assignment policies that are consistent with the policies
described in this document.
NIRs and LIRs must ensure that address space for which they
are responsible is only allocated or assigned subject to
agreements consistent with the license provisions of section
9.1.
Also, NIRs must, wherever possible, apply slow start,
assignment window, and second opinion policies to their own
members in a manner consistent with the way APNIC applies such
policies.
8 Address requests
------------------------
8.1 Processing of requests dependent on correct documentation
APNIC will only process requests that have been completely
and properly documented. If the documentation contains errors
or omissions, APNIC will advise the applicant as soon as
possible. APNIC may also request the applicant to provide
further information or clarify relevant issues that are not
clear in the initial request.
APNIC will process the request as soon as the errors and
omissions have been rectified or the additional questions
have been answered.
APNIC will make all reasonable efforts to maintain a
consistent and reliable level of service with respect to
processing of requests.
8.2 Security and confidentiality
APNIC will maintain systems and practices that protect the
confidentiality of all information relating to the commercial
and infrastructure operations of all members and their
customers. APNIC will ensure that the employment of all of its
staff or agents is based upon an explicit condition of
confidentiality regarding such information.
APNIC provides for authorisation and verification mechanisms
within the APNIC Whois Database. It is the responsibility of
each IR or end-user to apply these mechanisms.
8.3 Equitable processing of requests
APNIC will deal with all requests strictly in the order in
which it receives the proper documentation. To provide fair
treatment for all applicants, APNIC will not in any
circumstance provide for special treatment or make exceptions
to the standard order of request processing.
APNIC will seek to process all requests within a consistent
time and will maintain a request tracking system for efficient
request management.
8.4 General requirements for allocation requests
All requests for address space must be supported by
documentation describing:
* the network infrastructure of the organisation making the
request;
* any address space currently held by that organisation;
* previous assignments made by that organisation; and
* the intended use for the address space requested.
In addition to this general requirement, more specific
documentation may also be requested (see Sections 9.2, 9.3,
and 9.4).
8.5 Organisations seeking address space from multiple IRs
Organisations must obtain their address space from only one
IR at a time. Organisations requesting address space from any
IR must declare all the address space they currently hold,
regardless of the source. Organisations making concurrent
requests to more than one IR must declare the details of all
of those requests.
In certain circumstances (for example, where an organisation
is multihomed), strong technical reasons may justify an
organisation receiving address space from more than one
source.
For the purposes of this section, a parent organisation and
its subsidiaries are considered to be a single organisation.
Exceptions may arise in cases where the parts of the
organisation:
* are separate legal entities;
* maintain fully independent network infrastructures and are
routed under different Autonomous System numbers; or
* or can otherwise demonstrate a justified need to obtain
address space from more than one IR.
9 Address allocation
--------------------------
9.1 Address space license
APNIC will allocate and assign Internet resources on a
'license' basis, with such licenses to be of specific limited
duration (normally one year).
The conditions of all licenses are described in the APNIC
membership agreements, service agreements, and other relevant
APNIC documents.
Licenses to organisations shall be renewable on the following
conditions:
* the original basis of the allocation or assignment remains
valid; and
* that address space is properly registered at the time of
renewal.
When a license is renewed, the new license will be subject to
address space policies and license conditions effective at
the time of renewal, provided that a minimum notice period of
one year is given of any substantial changes to the conditions
of the current license.
All substantial changes to license conditions are subject to
the consensus of APNIC members, in accordance with the APNIC
Document Review Policies and Procedures.
Individual licenses shall only be subject to review if the
relevant IR has reason to believe that the existing license
terms are no longer being complied with. IRs may implement
their own procedures for the review of existing licenses as
they see fit.
9.2 Slow start mechanism
Subject to Section 9.2.1, APNIC and NIRs apply a slow start
mechanism to all new LIRs. The slow start is applied to
prevent allocations of large blocks of address space that may
then remain substantially unassigned.
The initial allocation an LIR receives from APNIC will be the
size of the minimum practical allocation described in Section
6.10.
9.2.1 Exceptions to slow start
In exceptional circumstances, an LIR may receive a greater
initial allocation if it can demonstrate that its immediate
need for address space exceeds the standard slow start
allocation.
The documentation required to justify an exception to the slow
start may include (but is not limited to):
* receipts for purchase of equipment,
* purchase orders, or
* signed project contracts indicating the immediate network
requirements to be met by the LIR.
9.3 Criteria for initial allocation
To be eligible to obtain an initial allocation, an LIR must:
* have used a /22 from their upstream provider or demonstrate
an immediate need for a /22;
* have complied with applicable policies in managing all
address space previously allocated to it;
* demonstrate a detailed plan for use of a /21 within a year;
and
* commit to renumber from previously deployed space into the
new address space within one year.
9.4 Criteria for subsequent allocations
After the initial allocation to an LIR, all subsequent
allocations will depend on the following:
* the LIR's verified usage rate (which is the rate at which
the LIR made assignments and sub-allocations from relevant
past allocations);
* their documented plans for address space; and
* their degree of compliance with APNIC policies with respect
to relevant past allocations.
Based on these factors, APNIC and NIRs will allocate enough
address space to meet the LIR's estimated needs for
a period up to one year. If APNIC or the NIR make an
allocation based on a period of less than one year, then they
must inform the LIR of the length of the period and the
reasons for selecting it.
9.4.1 No guarantee of contiguous allocations
APNIC will attempt to make subsequent allocations contiguous
with previous allocations, but cannot guarantee that this will
possible.
9.5 Prior allocations to be used first
An LIR is not eligible to receive subsequent allocations until
its current assignments account for at least eighty percent of
the total address space from all allocations it holds. This is
referred to as the "eighty percent rule".
9.5.1 Special circumstances - large assignments
An LIR may request an exception to the eighty percent rule if
it needs to make a single assignment that is larger than the
amount of space remaining.
9.6 Reservations not supported
When an LIR wants to assign address space for customers, it
must make the assignments from any address space it currently
holds.
When evaluating allocation requests, reserved address space is
considered to be unassigned.
9.7 Address aggregation
It is a condition of all allocations, that the allocated
address space is aggregated by the LIR within a minimum
number of route announcements (preferably one).
LIRs must only assign or sub-allocation addresses to
customers who will be using those addresses in relation to
network connectivity services provided by the LIR.
LIRs are expected to enter into agreements with their
customers specifying that the end-user will hold the
addresses only for so long as the end-user remains a customer
of that LIR. Such agreements should also be consistent with the
licence under which the address space is being used by the
LIR.
9.8 Validity of allocations and assignments
An allocation or assignment of address space is valid only
while the original criteria on which the allocation or
assignment was based continue to be valid.
An allocation or assignment becomes invalid if it is:
* made for a specific purpose that no longer exists; or
* based on information that is later found to be false or
incomplete.
If an allocation or assignment shall become invalid then the
address space must be returned to the appropriate IR.
9.9 Transfer of address space
Subject to the more specific provisions of Section 12, APNIC
does not recognise the sale or unauthorised transfer of
address space and will consider all such transfers to be
invalid. APNIC will require organisations holding such
transfers to return them to the appropriate IR.
10 LIR address space management
------------------------------------
Subject to the following provisions, LIRs may either sub-allocate or
assign address space to their customers.
10.1 Assignment window for LIRs
APNIC and NIRs shall apply an assignment window mechanism to
help LIRs understand and comply with APNIC policies and the
address management goals.
The assignment window indicates the maximum number of
addresses that an LIR may assign or sub-allocate to an
end-user without first seeking a 'second opinion'. If an LIR
wishes to make an ssignment or sub-allocation that exceeds
its assignment window, the LIR must first submit a second
opinion request.
LIRs start with an assignment window of zero, meaning all
proposed assignments must first be approved.
APNIC or the relevant NIR will regularly assess the
proficiency of LIR staff in making assignments and
sub-allocations and seeking second opinions, and will review
the size of the assignment window accordingly. As the LIR
staff become more proficient, the size of their assignment
window may be raised.
The maximum assignment window given to any LIR will be a /19
(8,192 addresses).
If an LIR's staff appears to become less proficient (for
example, due to the training of new staff or other relevant
circumstances) then that LIR's assignment window may be
temporarily reduced.
10.2 Assignment usage estimates
Requests for assignments must be supported by usage estimates
based on immediate and projected future need. These requests
must be accompanied by documentation that supports the
estimates.
The estimates should made for the following periods:
* immediately;
* within one year; and
* within two years.
APNIC recommends that, as a general guideline, organisations
should base their assignment requests on the assumption that
25 percent of the address space will be used immediately and
50 percent used within one year.
The end-user must provide documentation that supports its one
year usage estimate. If it is not possible for the end-user to
estimate confidently what the two year usage rate will be,
then APNIC or the NIR may make an allocation that will be
sufficient for the one year needs only.
10.3 Sub-allocations by LIRs
LIRs may sub-allocate address space to their downstream
customers which are operating networks, such as ISPs, subject
to the following conditions:
* Sub-allocations are non-portable and must be returned to
the LIR if the downstream customer ceases to receive
connectivity from the LIR.
* Sub-allocations are subject to the LIR's assignment window.
Requests for sub-allocations which exceed the LIR's
assignment window must first be referred to APNIC for
second opinion approval.
* The downstream customer which receives a sub-allocation
from an LIR is not permitted o further sub-allocate the
address space.
10.3.1 Effect of sub-allocations on lIR's usage rate
For the purposes of evaluating the LIR's usage rate (see
sections 9.4 and 9.5), sub-allocated address space will be
considered as "used". However, APNIC will give careful
consideration to the registration of assignments within the
allocations, and may request supporting documentation as
necessary.
10.4 Registration requirements
IRs are responsible for promptly and accurately registering
their allocations, sub-allocations, and assignments in the
APNIC Whois Database, as follows:
* All allocations and sub-allocations must be registered.
* Assignments for networks greater than /30 must be
registered.
* Assignments for networks of /30 or less may be registered,
at the discretion of the IR and the network administrator.
* Assignments to hosts may be registered, at the discretion
of the IR and the end-user.
10.4.1 Updating registration details
IRs must update the APNIC Whois Database when any of the
registration information changes. This is the responsibility
of the IR concerned, but may be formally delegated to the end-
user as a condition of the original assignment.
10.4.2 Registering contact persons
Administrative and technical contact persons must be
registered.
The registered administrative contact ('admin-c') must be
someone who is physically located at the site of the network,
subject to the following exceptions:
* For residential networks or users, the IR's technical
contact may be registered as admin-c.
* For networks in exceptional circumstances that make it
impractical to maintain an on-site administrative contact,
an off-site person may be registered as the admin-c.
The technical contact ('tech-c') need not be physically
located at the site of the network, but must be a person who
is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the network.
10.5 Responsibility to maintain in-addr.arpa records
LIRs should maintain in-addr.arpa resource records for their
customers' networks. If a network is not specifically
associated with an LIR then the in-addra.arpa records should
be maintained by either the appropriate NIR or APNIC.
11 Assignments and exchanges
---------------------------------
11.1 Small multihoming assignments
An organisation is eligible to receive a portable assignment
from APNIC if it:
* is currently multihomed with provider-based addresses, or
demonstrates a plan to multihome within one month; and
* agrees to renumber out of previously assigned address space.
An organisation is considered to be multihomed if its network
receives full-time connectivity from more than one ISP and has
one or more routing prefixes announced by at least two of its
ISPs.
Organisations requesting a portable assignment under these
terms must demonstrate that they are able to use 25 percent
of the requested assignment immediately and 50 percent within
one year.
There is no minimum assignment size for portable assignments
made under these terms.
11.2 Internet Exchange Points
Internet Exchange Points are eligible to receive a portable
assignment from APNIC to be used exclusively to connect the
IXP participant devices to the Exchange Point.
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /24.
Global routability of the portable assignment is left to the
discretion of the IXP and its participants.
11.3 Critical infrastructure
The following critical infrastructure networks, if operating
in the Asia Pacific region, are eligible to receive a
portable assignment:
* root domain name system (DNS) server;
* global top level domain (gTLD) nameservers;
* country code TLD (ccTLDs) nameservers;
* IANA;
* Regional Internet Registry (RIRs); and
* National Internet Registry (NIRs).
Assignments to critical infrastructure are available only to
the actual operators of the network infrastructure performing
such functions. Registrar organisations which do not actually
host the network housing the registry infrastructure, will
not be eligible for an assignment under this policy.
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /24.
Exchanges made under this policy remain subject to the
address space license policy.
11.4 Renumbering to promote aggregation
Organisations holding multiple non-aggregated portable address
blocks may return them in exchange for a single, aggregated
range, under what is referred to as the "No questions asked
policy". This exchange may be requested without the
requirement to document the efficiency of existing assignments
and the usage rates.
Exchanges made under this policy remain subject to the address
space license policy.
12 Mergers, acquisitions, and takeovers of LIRs
----------------------------------------------------
12.1 Updating registration details
If an LIR changes ownership (due to a merger, sale, or
takeover), then the new entity must register any changes to
its network usage and contact personnel. If the effect of the
ownership change is that the LIR changes name, then the LIR
must provide to APNIC relevant legal documentation supporting
the name change.
12.2 Effect on membership agreement
If an LIR changes ownership then the new entity should advise
APNIC of the change. APNIC membership is not transferable from
one entity to another; however, if the effect of the ownership
change is that the LIR becomes a subsidiary of another entity,
and the infrastructures of the respective entities remain
fully independent, then the membership agreement may continue.
12.3 Consequences for allocations
Following ownership change of an LIR, APNIC will review the
status of any allocations that are held by the new entity or
entities, with regard to the practical effect on their
infrastructures.
If the practical effect of ownership change is that the
infrastructures are merged, then APNIC will not continue to
make separate allocations to both. This situation will
invalidate the membership agreement of the LIR that is
effectively subsumed.
When assessing the status of allocations, APNIC requires full
disclosure of all address space held by all of the entities in
question. If full disclosure is not made, then APNIC will
consider any allocations to be invalid and will require that
they be returned.
12.4 Closure of LIRs
If an LIR holding APNIC address space ceases to provide
Internet connectivity services, all of its address space must
be returned to APNIC. It is the responsibility of the LIR (or
any liquidator or administrator appointed to wind up the
member's business) to advise all of its customers that address
space will be returned to APNIC, and that renumbering into new
address space will be necessary.
In the case that a new LIR takes over the business or
infrastructure of the closed LIR, the existing address space
may be transferred to the new LIR, however such a transfer is
subject to reexamination by APNIC and may be treated as a new
address request process.
13 Request evaluation guidelines
-------------------------------------
This document does not provide specific details of request
evaluation by APNIC, or of expectations relating to specific
technologies. Such details are dependent on technological
advances, and may change frequently. Therefore APNIC will
publish separate guidelines documents relating to specific
technologies or techniques as required.
Such guidelines may contain any of the following:
* descriptions of evaluation procedures to be used for
certain types of address space requests;
* summaries of the best current practices that organisations
requesting address space will generally be expected to
implement in their network plans; and
* other information that may assist organisations to request
address space.
Any guidelines published will be developed within the APNIC
community, and will be consistent with the goals and policies
described in this document.